Plausible vs Fathom: Which Privacy Analytics Tool Wins in 2026?
We ran both Plausible and Fathom on live sites for 30 days. Identical setup, identical traffic. Here's the honest verdict.
Plausible
Fathom
TL;DR
Both are excellent. Plausible wins for most people by a narrow margin on price, API flexibility, and dashboard design. Fathom wins if you prioritize UI polish and want slightly better-looking default reports.
If you’re still using GA4: either one is an upgrade. Don’t overthink this.
The test
We ran both tools simultaneously on two identical test sites (matched traffic, matched content) for 30 days between March 15 and April 14, 2026. Same tracking setup, same goals, same pageview-tier plans.
The head-to-head
Setup
Tie. Both are a single <script> tag. Both took under 5 minutes from signup to first tracked pageview. Both offer WordPress and Webflow plugins for the less technical.
Plausible: 9.5/10 · Fathom: 9.5/10
Dashboard
Plausible shows you everything on one long scrollable page — every chart, every table, a single UI. Fathom splits things across a sidebar of views (Pages, Referrers, Campaigns, etc.), which some people prefer. Fathom’s individual charts are slightly more polished visually; Plausible is denser and faster to scan.
Preference depends on how you work. We preferred Plausible because we rarely want to click between reports.
Plausible: 9/10 · Fathom: 8.5/10
Data accuracy
Indistinguishable. Across 30 days on matched test sites, both tools reported pageview and visitor counts within 1.5% of each other. Both outperformed GA4 by roughly the same margin (+7–11%).
Plausible: 8.5/10 · Fathom: 8.5/10
Pricing
This is the biggest gap. At the entry tier:
| Plausible | Fathom | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting plan | $9/mo (10K views) | $15/mo (100K views) |
| 100K pageviews | $19/mo | $15/mo |
| 1M pageviews | $59/mo | $80/mo |
| Self-hosted option | ✓ Free | ✗ |
Fathom’s entry plan includes 100K pageviews, which is actually better value for mid-sized sites. But if you’re under 100K/mo or over 1M/mo, Plausible wins on price. And Plausible’s self-hosted option is free — Fathom doesn’t offer one.
Plausible: 8/10 · Fathom: 7.5/10
Features
Both cover the fundamentals: pageviews, visitors, referrers, UTM campaigns, custom events, outbound link tracking, file downloads, and goal conversions. Differences:
- Plausible wins: better API, more flexible custom event properties, open-source codebase, self-hosted option, Stats API included on all plans.
- Fathom wins: email reports look nicer, UI feels slightly more premium, “Flagship” plan includes more sites for the price.
Plausible: 8.5/10 · Fathom: 8/10
Privacy & compliance
Both are cookieless, both are GDPR and CCPA compliant out of the box, both process data in the EU (Plausible) or distribute globally (Fathom via Cloudflare edge). Neither requires a cookie banner.
Tie.
Plausible: 9/10 · Fathom: 9/10
Final scores
| Plausible | Fathom | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 8.4/10 | 8.1/10 |
When to pick Plausible
- You want the cheapest entry tier (<100K pageviews).
- You value the open-source / self-hosted option even if you don’t use it today.
- You prefer a dense, single-page dashboard you can scan in 30 seconds.
- You need robust API access for custom reporting.
When to pick Fathom
- You’re sitting at the 100K pageview range and want better value than Plausible’s equivalent tier.
- You prefer a more polished, report-by-report UI.
- You want the nicest-looking weekly email reports for stakeholders.
- You run multiple sites on one account and want the Flagship plan’s multi-site economics.
The honest truth
These two products are 90% the same. Both teams are small, independent, and ethically run. Both offer excellent customer support. Neither will disappear on you. You cannot make a wrong choice between them — you can only make a slightly suboptimal one, and “suboptimal” here means you paid $6/month more than you needed to.
The only wrong answer is sticking with GA4 because you’re scared to switch.
Try Plausible free for 30 days → Try Fathom free for 30 days →